Bernanke Tells Retirees and Savers “To Take One For The Team” – Interest Rates To Remain At Zero

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke presented to Congress today the semiannual Monetary Policy Report which discusses current economic conditions, monetary policy and thoughts on fiscal policy.

Mr. Bernanke vigorously defended the Federal Reserve’s zero interest rate policy stating that the benefits of  an easy money policy outweigh the “potential costs of the increased risk-taking in some financial markets.”  Mr. Bernanke noted that low rates have promoted a recovery in housing markets, auto sales, job creation and consumer spending.

While expounding on the benefits of low low interest rates, Mr. Bernanke avoided discussing the devastating impact that zero rates are having on retirees and savers.  Interest income on bank deposits has virtually disappeared.  Banks are currently offering only a fraction of a percent interest on most deposits and there is no reason to believe that this situation will change anytime soon.

Mr. Bernanke noted that interest rates have been close to zero since December 2008 and will not be raised until the economy and labor markets improve

With unemployment well above normal levels and inflation subdued, progress toward the Federal Reserve’s mandated objectives of maximum employment and price stability has required a highly accommodative monetary policy. Under normal circumstances, policy accommodation would be provided through reductions in the FOMC’s target for the federal funds rate–the interest rate on overnight loans between banks. However, as this rate has been close to zero since December 2008, the Federal Reserve has had to use alternative policy tools.

At its December 2012 meeting, the FOMC agreed to shift to providing more explicit guidance on how it expects the policy rate to respond to economic developments. Specifically, the December postmeeting statement indicated that the current exceptionally low range for the federal funds rate “will be appropriate at least as long as the unemployment rate remains above 6-1/2 percent, inflation between one and two years ahead is projected to be no more than a half percentage point above the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run goal, and longer-term inflation expectations continue to be well anchored.”

In many ways, the Fed’s zero interest rate policy (ZIRP) has been a zero sum game.  Since every loan also represents an income asset to someone else, zero interest rates have been the mechanism for transferring wealth from savers to debtors.  Retirees with savings who do not want to go out on the risk curve by investing in higher yielding stocks or bonds will continue to suffer a significant loss of income.

The Fed’s zero rate interest policy is also contributing to the risk that many companies will be unable to provide promised pension benefits to workers.  Pension plans rely on income from investments in long term assets to cover pension benefits.  The Fed’s ZIRP policy has resulted in dramatically decreased interest payments on long term assets, resulting in huge unfunded pension plan liabilities.  Companies that cannot afford to make up the shortfall in their pension funds are cutting benefits and eliminating retirement plans.

Not surprisingly, many Americans are forced to work well being the normal retirement age of 65 since they need additional income.  The Census Bureau is projecting a 67% increase in the number of workers older than 65 between 2015 and 2040.

Ironically, the Fed’s policy of zero rates is hurting both the elderly and the young.  For every person past 65 years old forced to work longer, there is one less job opening for younger people who are increasingly finding themselves unemployed or working as waiters after four years of college.

Despite the fact that low interest rates are beneficial in some ways, Mr. Bernanke seems oblivious to the serious financial damage a zero interest rate policy is having on the American middle class.

Also see:  Fed Guarantees Bank Savers Negative Returns


  1. So what do you want, inflation? That would help conservative investors and retirees who live on interest payments. But it would ruin any chance of the economy improving.

    As the saying goes ” inflation is the worst hidden tax there is on the poor and the middle class.”

    It seems that the author would complain if we had high interest rates (great for some seniors) but the worst outcome for the economy or low rates. If I’m not mistaken the author warned of high inflation from the Fed pumping all that money into the economy.

    When that didn’t happen he whines about low inflation and low interest rates. Three cheers for inflation and high interest in a slow growth global economy. (Happy now?)

  2. Problem Bank List Staff says

    Nice try.

    The problem is worse than it appears. While nominal interest rates are slightly above zero, real interest rates are negative after taking current inflation rates into account.
    Not only are bank depositors receiving near zero on their savings, they are also suffering from a loss of purchasing power.

    The Federal Reserve’s financial repression has resulted in negative interest rates and a transfer of wealth from creditors (savers) to debtors. Of course, not everyone has a problem with financial repression. Individuals with a negative net worth who lack the ability to save and are financially irresponsible while choking on debt will argue, of course, that negative interest rates are a good thing.

    More on this topic:

    More important than interest rates on deposits,
    however, is something called the “real interest
    rate.” This is the interest rate after considering
    rising prices. Price increases are usually
    measured by the government with a statistic
    called the Consumer Price Index (CPI). The
    real interest rate subtracts the CPI (or other
    measure of rising prices) from the actual
    interest rate. So if a bank gives me 1.5%
    interest on a 1-year CD and prices go up by
    3% during that time, I have a real interest rate
    of -1.5% (that is a negative 1.5%

    Negative real interest rates hurt all savers, but
    these rates are especially damaging to the
    elderly and those on fixed incomes. It is no
    longer possible for senior citizens to live on the
    interest of their savings and investments. In
    fact, our negative interest rates result in a
    situation in which our seniors must rely on the
    depletion of their principle for all of their living
    expenses. These principle balances go very
    quickly in this situation.

    Keep in mind that there can be no negative
    interest rates without inflation. Inflation is
    clearly the chief evil here. Rising prices, of
    course, are a hidden tax caused by the “print
    ing” of money. This hidden tax steals our
    property because the value of our savings and
    investments (and even the value of the money
    in our wallets) is being taken away. This is a
    clear violation of property rights and is theft by
    any reasonable definition of the term.

  3. It is not my first time to pay a visit this web site, i
    am visiting this website dailly and obtain
    nice facts from here all the time.

  4. Mary Golden says

    We are going into the 8th year of theft of interest from elderly savers, those of us who scrimped our whole damn lives so that we could have stuff like dental care and home maintenance after retirement and have a house and a few bucks to leave to our kids. Eight years ago, the interest rate on savings was 5.3%, 1.2% lower than interest rates for mortgages. Today, we can get 1% only by tying up our money for years, and if we want to keep the money liquid in case the government and the Fed decide to behave decently, we are lucky to get 1/10 of 1%. 8 years ago I got over 8,000 from savings. From the same account last year I got $163. How can this NOT affect old people and their morale and their desire to live. All I can do for my kids if I want to leave them something is to die as soon as possible, before the house falls totally apart or I have to take out one of those punishing reverse mortgages. My late husband and I did not see this coming…that we would have a government, both political parties, who would steal from savers and give the money to the crooks who made the financial mess in the first place. Just that they regarded stealing from the elderly as a better solution than punishing banks makes me wonder what they have in mind for us next. Who will be the next victims? We can be sure that it won’t be the bankers…..they are now paying only 1/40th to 1/80th in interest of the amount of interest they are collecting from college students. How is this fair? I have asked my senators and my congressman, and they have not replied, and when I try to question their staffs, they say they NEVER heard that there was a problem. We are royally screwed. There is no decency left when old people can no long sensibly plan for their old by saving and when banks can steal the money, not only from our taxes but from the savers, and have no fear of going to jail. What is this country turning into? Do we need a third viable political party that’s not in the pockets of the crooks?

Speak Your Mind