Foreclosure Settlement Q&A – Who Wins, Who Loses – A Victory For The Irresponsible

A $25 billion foreclosure settlement reached between the government and the big banks has many wondering who will win and who will lose among the different parties involved.  Although the settlement is complicated and will take years to work out, the basic framework will please some and annoy others.

Here are some basic questions and answers about the settlement, which according to the Justice Department was “the result of unprecedented coordination among enforcement agencies” and “the result of extensive investigations”.

Questions and Answers

Question 1

The government has proudly publicized the settlement against the big banks as a major victory for consumers and the housing market.  Will this settlement end the housing crisis and result in higher home values?

Answer:  The government has spent trillions of dollars since 2008 trying to stabilize banks, homeowners and property values.  If they could have solved the problem, they would have.  The $25 billion amount of the settlement represents only a tiny fraction of a percent (0.20%) of total mortgage debt of over $9 trillion dollars.  By comparison, the U.S. government is currently running a deficit of almost $100 billion per month.

Question 2

I heard that the settlement will give people who lost their homes up to $2,000 each even though they were able to live for free in the home for 2 to 3 years before losing it while not making mortgage payments.  Will a borrower who sacrificed to make all mortgage payments on time be given anything?

Answer: No, a borrower who made his payments on time is entitled to nothing.

Questions 3

The mortgage settlement will forgive up to $20,000 of a loan balance for a person who owes more on the mortgage than his home is worth.  I bought my house for $300,000, the same price as my next door neighbor and now our houses are worth $200,000.  I made a downpayment of $100,000 and my neighbor did 100% financing.  Will I be able to get $20,000 forgiven on my mortgage balance even though I am not “underwater” since I saved up to make a downpayment?

Answer: No, you will get nothing since you made a downpayment and are not “underwater” on your mortgage.

Question 4

I heard that people who owe more on their mortgage than their house is worth and have stopped paying their mortgage can get up to $35,000 from the bank for”moving costs” if they agree to sell their home instead of forcing the bank do a foreclosure.  I need to move for a new job and my house is paid off with no mortgage.  Will I be eligible for cash assistance to help with my moving expenses?

Answer: No, you are entitled to nothing.  The “cash for keys” program is only for borrowers who owe more than the house is worth and are not making mortgage payments.

Question 5

The mortgage settlement was only with 5 big banks.  I have my mortgage with a small local lender.  Can I still expect to receive cash payments under the settlement agreement?

Answer:  No, you get nothing.  The settlement is only with the five large banks – Bank of America, JP Morgan, Wells Fargo, Citigroup and Ally Financial.

Other voices on the mortgage settlement

Inside Mortgage Finance

What’s really interesting is the early reaction to how the settlement money will be allegedly spent. Some $3 billion reportedly will be used to compensate as many as two million borrowers who lost their home through foreclosure with a cash payment of $1,500 or more. Did all these borrowers actually suffer specific losses due to foreclosure mishandling? If not, why are we looking to make payments to people who defaulted on mortgages? The bulk of the settlement (reportedly $17 billion) will be used to make principal reductions of $20,000 to current borrowers with underwater mortgages. Sounds good, except that the average underwater borrower probably needs $50,000 or more to get their loan anywhere near the current value of their home.

Aaron Task of The Daily Ticker

The settlement is being hailed as the biggest multi-state settlement since the 1998 tobacco agreement. But as Henry and I note in the accompanying video, the settlement is too small to really help the housing market, or even do much for individual victims of fraud and abuse. The deal may, in fact, hurt housing by sending a message to people who’ve stayed current on their mortgages that irresponsible behavior is what gets rewarded in America. That, presumably, is not the intention of policymakers but the “moral hazard” fallout from the settlement. More Americans may “walk away” from uneconomic loans, which will put additional pressure on local housing markets.

Wall Street Journal

Rarely have so many politicians cashed in so blatantly on so little wrong-doing. In 2010, a group of AGs led by Iowa’s Tom Miller spotted political gold in reports that some bank employees had approved legal documents without proper review. They quickly spun this into the fairy tale that evil banks were kicking borrowers out of their homes for no good reason.

To date there’s no evidence that borrowers current on their mortgage payments were improperly ejected from their homes.

At least $10 billion will go toward principal reduction for delinquent borrowers or those on the brink of foreclosure with loans issued by private lenders. In other words, Washington is taking money from bank shareholders and investors in mortgage-backed securities, who will see the value of their holdings fall, and giving it to people who aren’t paying their bills. Welcome to the “fairness” era.

Meanwhile, 42% of all borrowers with loans in foreclosure haven’t made a mortgage payment in two years, according to Lender Processing Services. They are being rewarded for not paying their bills.


  1. Foreclosure Settlement Q&A – Who Wins, Who Loses – A Victory For The Irresponsible

    Wow Einstein what a headline! Everyone who is in mortgage trouble is irresponsible? The banks hold no responsibility?

    How about the average Joe, who never refinanced his mortgage and because my compnay could not get capital to build their machines had to close. I lost my job and now my house is under foreclosure. I am irresponsible? Really. Frankly, if the Government had any balls at all they would simply stop all foreclosures and supervise every mortgage in the country to be rewritten.

    Get into the real America before you post this crap. Our President is not in touch with the real problems nor is this publication.

  2. Problem Bank List Staff says:

    There are, of course, two sides to this issue. The improvident will naturally argue that their loss should be socialized at the expense of others. Unless one believes in the “free lunch theory”, the cost of the foreclosure settlement will benefit some at the expense of others.
    The most irksome part of the settlement to those ultimately stuck with the bill derives from the fact that the people getting money out of the settlement weren’t paying their bills, suffered no loss, lived in a house for years without making a payment and as delinquent borrowers, are now being rewarded.

    The Obama administration took a victory lap after it inked a $25 billion settlement with five major banks for alleged foreclosure abuses last week. But who, exactly, was harmed? Housing and Urban Development chief Shaun Donovan stopped by the Journal’s editorial page Thursday to answer that question and others about the settlement, and it was a revealing chat.
    Mr. Donovan had a harder time answering questions about who’s getting the money, and why. He emphasized, for instance, that it was right to reward delinquent borrowers with cash payouts because banks charged those borrowers fees they shouldn’t have and didn’t always adequately inform them of government programs to help them avoid foreclosure. But how many borrowers current on their mortgage were booted out of their homes? Mr. Donovan couldn’t provide a number but estimated it would be a “tiny fraction” of robo-signed foreclosures.

    That’s a remarkable admission given that HUD, the Department of Justice, state attorneys general and others spent 18 months pressuring banks to strike a deal. What the HUD secretary revealed is that the government did all that work — which delayed foreclosures and prevented the market from clearing — largely to protect homeowners who weren’t even paying their bills.

  3. Reba Keppel says:

    I’m not trying to change the topic, just lookin for a little bit of info because We’re looking to move to another town and are looking for an legitimate moving outfit. We were curious about using this organization, Move4Less 1015 Shary Cir #7 Concord, CA 94518 – 925-808-3139. Is there some sort of movers fraud or review website I could possibly use to do a background check?

  4. Monte Manteca says:

    There are a couple of sources that I know of. The first is, they have a reliable community of reviewers and a wide selection of good resources. The second is Ripoff Report. Do a search for the url of the website like so moving & storage concord ca and see what comes up.

Speak Your Mind